Checkout.com vs Authorize.net
A feature-by-feature comparison for ISVs integrating payments.
Checkout.com processes and acquires its own transactions, from London, across 50+ local markets, and splits payments, risk and reporting into distinct API services. Authorize.net does none of the acquiring. It is a gateway in front of separate processors, part of Visa through CyberSource, with XML and REST interfaces and the Advanced Fraud Detection Suite for screening.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Checkout.com | Authorize.net |
|---|---|---|
| Integration Architecture | 8 | 5 |
| API & Developer Experience | 8 | 5 |
| White-Label Capabilities | 5 | 3 |
| Processor Flexibility | 3 | 4 |
| Pricing & Fee Structure | 7 | 5 |
| Omnichannel & In-Person Payments | 4 | 4 |
| Fraud & Security | 8 | 6 |
| Revenue Sharing | 6 | 3 |
| Merchant Onboarding | 5 | 6 |
| Global Reach | 8 | 5 |
| Recurring Billing | 6 | 6 |
| Customer Support | 6 | 5 |
| PayFac Options | 6 | 3 |
Get this comparison as a shareable PDF
We'll send the Checkout.com vs Authorize.net breakdown to your inbox — ready to share with your team.
Best for
Checkout.com
Best for enterprise ISVs with significant international volume needing local acquiring and cross-border optimization. Not ideal for early-stage ISVs due to minimum volume requirements.
Best for
Authorize.net
Best for ISVs integrating with merchants who already use Authorize.net, or ISVs wanting multi-processor flexibility through a widely-supported gateway. Not ideal for ISVs building modern embedded payment experiences.
Checkout.com vs Authorize.net: What ISVs Need to Know
Choosing between Checkout.com and Authorize.net for embedded payments is a decision that directly impacts your ISV’s revenue model, merchant experience, and technical architecture. This comparison breaks down where each platform excels from an ISV integration perspective.
Key Differences for ISVs
The most important distinction between Checkout.com and Authorize.net comes down to how each platform approaches ISV payment facilitation. Checkout.com and Authorize.net take fundamentally different approaches to merchant onboarding, revenue sharing, and platform integration — and those differences matter when you’re building payments into your software.
Integration architecture varies significantly between the two. ISVs evaluating Checkout.com vs Authorize.net should consider how each platform handles sub-merchant onboarding, payment splitting, and settlement timing. The right choice depends on your specific vertical, transaction volumes, and how much control you need over the merchant payment experience.
Pricing and revenue economics also differ. ISVs earn money from embedded payments through the spread between what they charge merchants and what the processor charges them. The pricing model each platform uses — flat-rate, interchange-plus, or custom — directly affects your payment revenue per transaction.
Which Platform Fits Your ISV?
The best choice between Checkout.com and Authorize.net depends on your ISV’s specific requirements:
- Transaction volume: Higher-volume ISVs may benefit from interchange-plus pricing, while lower-volume platforms often prefer flat-rate simplicity
- Merchant type: B2B merchants have different payment needs than consumer-facing businesses
- Geographic scope: International payment support varies significantly between providers
- Integration depth: Some ISVs need white-label checkout while others are fine with co-branded experiences
- Revenue model: How much of the payment margin you want to capture determines which platform’s economics work better
The ISV Payment Integration Perspective
For ISVs evaluating Checkout.com vs Authorize.net, the comparison shouldn’t stop at processing fees. Consider the total cost of integration, ongoing maintenance, and the revenue opportunity from embedded payments. The platform that generates the most payment revenue for your ISV while providing the best merchant experience is the right choice — and that calculation is different for every software company.
Evaluate both platforms against your specific use case. Request ISV-specific pricing from each, and compare the total economics including setup costs, per-transaction revenue, and the engineering investment required to integrate and maintain each platform.